The Daily Prompt
Read in your language:

← Front page · Archive · tech

TECH · The Verge · 2026-10-17 · editor 9/10 · 1 min read fact-checked

Elon Musk settles lawsuits over $1 million voter giveaway

#Elon Musk #America PAC #Lawsuit #Politics

Elon Musk has reached a settlement regarding two lawsuits filed by Arizona residents concerning his 2024 sweepstakes, which promised to award $1 million daily to randomly selected registered voters in swing states. The legal challenges were filed in Austin, Texas, though the specific terms of the settlement remain undisclosed.

The lawsuits originated from claims that Musk’s lottery was fraudulent. Plaintiffs alleged that they would not have signed the petition required to enter the giveaway had they known the selection process was not truly random. The controversy intensified when Philadelphia’s District Attorney sued to stop the operation, characterizing it as an illegal lottery. During court proceedings, Chris Gober, a representative for Musk’s America PAC, admitted that the $1 million recipients were not selected by chance, stating, "We know exactly who will be announced as the $1 million recipient today and tomorrow."

This admission directly contradicted Musk’s public claims that the drawings were random. Beyond the legality of the lottery, the plaintiffs accused Musk and America PAC of using the sweepstakes as a mechanism to harvest user data. They argued that the petition contained no limitations on how personal information could be used or sold, nor did it provide transparency regarding the PAC's planned use of the collected data. The lawsuit sought to address the alleged deception involved in the campaign, which aimed to incentivize voter registration through the promise of large financial prizes. The settlement effectively concludes the litigation filed by the two Arizona residents, though the underlying questions regarding data privacy and the legality of the PAC's tactics remain a point of public scrutiny.

Editor's note: The draft is a concise and accurate summary of the provided text, capturing the core legal conflict and the settlement.

Source

AI-generated and fact-checked against the original report; claims the gate cannot verify are held back.